<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tom Markiewicz - Latest Comments in Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://tmarkiewicz.disqus.com/</link><description>Thoughts on technology, marketing, and entrepreneurship.</description><atom:link href="https://tmarkiewicz.disqus.com/performancing_blog_extension_for_firefox/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:04:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-8941997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just an update- the new version of Performancing now has a post to draft feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tmarkiewicz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:04:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-8941996</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lloyd,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your point is well taken. I overstated my point about the Performancing plugin by inplying that Flock was built around that single feature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do still believe though that Flock has an uphill climb as many of the concepts emphasized by Flock are (or can be) added to Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tmarkiewicz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-8941995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh no we, Flock, did not "built an entirely new browser based on this concept." We are at the beginning of building "a new browser" (Firefox at its core) around the concept of a consistent, complete user experience for the emerging participation Web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seasons greetings,&lt;br&gt;Lloyd D Budd&lt;br&gt;Flock QA (Qommunity and quality Assurance)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://flock.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flock.com"&gt;http://flock.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lloyd Dewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-8941994</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually already use SpellBound in FireFox. It's probably one of the most useful extensions I've found yet. I initially couldn't get it working with v1.5, but now it's operating as usual. I'm still not sold on the Performancing extension yet, but with some more minor features (again I need save as draft) I can see it being a primary method of blog authoring. I currently use the native WordPress editor and with SpellBound, I have everything I need.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tmarkiewicz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:09:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title><link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-8941993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Need spellchecking? The latest development build of &lt;a href="http://spellbound.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://spellbound.sourceforge.net/"&gt;SpellBound&lt;/a&gt; integrates seamlessly with this blogging tool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Asa Dotzler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>